Welcome to choof.org. Unfair. Unbalanced. |
More Links Reenhead |
December 07, 2004
New Yorker on Ole Anthony An excellent article in this week's New Yorker Magazine (not available online) discusses Old Anthony, "[h]is many enemies, most of them televangelists, sometimes call him Ole Antichrist..." Anthony publishes The Door Magazine and runs the Trinity Foundation. ...Anthony has waged a guerrilla war against televangelism-"a multibillion-dollar industry," as he describes it, "untaxed and unregulated, that preys on the elderly and the desperate." The United States has an estimated eighty million evangelical Christians, and about twenty-five hundred ministries that broadcast to them over radio and television. Dallas, the buckle of the Bible Belt, is one of their unofficial headquarters. Fifteen miles from Trinity's ramshackle homes, its opposite number, the Trinity Broadcasting Network, owns a gleaming office building that resembles the White House. Since 1973, TBN has created a twenty-four-hour lineup of religious shows that now go out over forty-six satellites to nearly seven thousand television stations worldwide. A few of its most popular ministers, among them local figures such as Benny Hinn and Kenneth Copeland, tend to preach what's known as the "Prosperity Gospel," which promises health and wealth to all true believers and generous donors. Twice a year, TBN hosts "Praise-a-thons," which raise an average of ninety million dollars each.Posted by chris at December 7, 2004 10:58 AM Ole Anthony's work, whatever one may think of him personally, is indispensable. His exposure of religious fraud and mind control paints a bleak picture of the gullibility and hypocrisy of a huge segment of our culture. One can only hope that Anthony's activities will at least make people reflect with intelligence when confronted with fakes purportedly speaking for God. I am not optimistic. Posted by: Romeo Salta at December 10, 2004 08:37 AMAnthony's theology, at least as represented in this article, is idiosyncratic but not uninteresting. I am thinking especially of recognition that suffering, without ceasing to be evil, is nonethless an essential part of human existence -- and that it can sometimes be the vehicle of spiritual growth. Such ideas were common in much of medieval Catholicism. They are not unheard of in the Reformation traditions -- as a Lutheran, I think naturally of Luther's "theology of the Cross." (And a similar idea is one of the Buddha's Noble Truths). But this idea is utterly lacking in the "prosperity gospel" proclaimed by the charlatans one sees on television. Theirs is what Luther disdained as a "theology of glory," and which required the Reformation to correct. In a sense, then, these so-called "Evangelicals" are really preaching the same message that the Reformers identified as Antichrist. Hmmm..... Posted by: Rev. Michael Church at December 11, 2004 11:23 AMI am grateful for the work of people like Ole Anthony who expose "born again, holy ghost anointed swindlers." My mother, during her later years, fell victim to more than one such swindler, hoping in vain for a miraculous healing from diabetes. Did not Jesus warn his followers most urgently to be on the watch for false prophets? Posted by: Rev. Otto A. Sotnak at December 12, 2004 10:15 PMPost a comment
Powered
by |